GST India: Impact on Banking Sector:
Tax Rate:
Services offered by banks
are taxed at 14.5% currently which under GST regime are likely to become
costlier at standard rate of 17-18%. Several activities of banks are currently
exempt from service tax (Ex: Fund based activities like interest payable on
deposits / savings bank accounts and loans disbursed) which would incur GST
unless otherwise exclusively exempted. Several services provided to weaker
sections of society could get taxed if not exempted making the services
costlier.
Elimination of cascading effect:
Banks will also be able to
set-off their GST liabilities against credit received on purchase of goods (IT
infrastructure and furniture etc.) and resultant savings could get ultimately
passed onto end customer. Through the concept of ISD (Input service distribution)
the accumulated input credit could be transferred and utilized in cases of
locations discharging GST liability are different from location where inputs
are received.
Business Process Change:
Banks provide services to customers who are mobile not only pan-India
but international as well. Ex: Credit cards issued by Bank from central
location to a customer may be swiped anywhere. With advent of net banking the
address of customer in account is not where he necessarily stays and obtains
banking services (Ex: Cheque book, Loans, Statements etc.) A customer having
his account in Bengaluru may during his vacation in J&K transfer funds by
mobile/net banking to somebody in Hyderabad. Determining point of supply for
services would add significantly to compliance costs. Under such circumstance a
bank having presence in only 10-15 states will have to take registration for 37
states/UT.
In case of loans availed by customers, the initial verification is done
by outsourced local agencies, loan processing is done centrally, disbursement
done locally, repayment done by net banking/ECS mandate. Under such
circumstance determining point of supply at each stage is very cumbersome.
Several services by bank to a customer are centralized (Ex: Demat
Account, Wealth Management services, bigger home loans etc.) while several
others are localized (Ex: Savings account, Personal loan, OD etc.). As is evident
these complexities add to compliance costs due to multiple assessments and
audits. Clarity on single/multiple ISD registration for distributing inputs
across multiple states is needed.
As banks deal with a host of vendors, reversal of ITC for services
availed from a blacklisted dealer or dealer who does not discharge his GST
liability would lead to increased costs and necessitate additional efforts in
tracking dealer status.
Bank Head office also provides services to branches which may become
taxable under GST. The IT systems of banks need to be upgraded to meet all
these requirements related to multiple registrations, determining point of
supply of services, compliance needs and Input Service distribution.
Complying with the requirements of reverse charge and partial reverse
charge mechanism would add to further compliance costs.
(The views expressed in this blog are of the author's and do not represent any organization)
No comments:
Post a Comment